Busting myths about franchise agreements
The key to a successful franchise is a positive working relationship between the franchisor and the franchisee. The first test of this relationship will be developing a franchise agreement. But there are many myths and pre-conceptions about franchise agreements that can cloud the relationship from the outset.
MYTH: A hand-shake will do - we don’t really need a franchise agreement.
TRUTH: The franchise agreement provides a legal framework for the long-term interaction between the franchisor and the franchisee.
It is in both parties’ interests to devote sufficient time and resources to negotiating and drawing up an accurate agreement. The franchise agreement should be a meaningful and dynamic instrument which can survive the length of the franchise relationship. A written agreement will mean each party is aware of their rights and obligations and the process for resolving disputes from the outset.
MYTH: A franchise agreement is an immutable, static list of obligations.
TRUTH: It is true that traditionally, franchise agreements looked consistent and uniform. But as franchising evolves and knowledge in this sector develops, a more flexible approach is required.
From the franchisor’s perspective the contract needs some degree of uniformity to avoid accusations that individual franchisees have been treated differently or unfairly. Also, the franchisor needs to ensure its assets are adequately protected, so it is inevitable that the franchisor will require many of the same key obligations from all the franchisees. As with any commercial negotiation there will be issues on which the franchisor is unable to alter its position, but there should also be areas where a degree of accommodation is possible. The advantage to be gained from such accommodation can vastly outweigh the seeming sacrifice at the negotiating table.
The term “franchise” has evolved from the Middle French “franchir” meaning “to free”. The concept of freedom or flexibility should be the basis for every franchise agreement.
MYTH: The franchise agreement is heavily slanted in favour of the franchisor.
TRUTH: Certainly the odds are stacked in favour of the franchisor at the outset because the business belongs to the franchisor, the franchisor usually drafts the contract and associated franchising manuals, and the franchisor is perceived to select the franchisee. In reality however there is much scope for manoeuvre in negotiating the agreement and franchisees should never underestimate the potential leverage they possess. It is always open to the franchisee to seek to redress the balance to achieve the deal that best suits its requirements.
MYTH: The franchise agreement and related negotiations are a mere formality and a one-size-fits-all precedent agreement will do the trick.
TRUTH: All franchise relationships are as individual as the parties involved. Tailoring an agreement to reflect the specific needs of each franchise relationship will be a key for future success.
If you would like to know more please read the full version of this article or talk to someone in our franchise team. |